Construction, sculpture or art, and tombstone manufacturing are the domain headings saved in the old article. The frozen evidence does not connect those headings to one identified big stone cutting machine. This version keeps the labels visible while separating them from machine, stone, process and result claims.
Application labels awaiting separate proof
Construction
A review would need the exact machine and tool, identified stone, project drawings, intended output and attributable acceptance record. None is supplied by the archive.
Sculpture or art
The heading is not evidence of carving, shaping, accuracy, surface quality or artistic suitability. A named work and records tied to one machine would be required.
Tombstone manufacturing
The saved label provides no product specification, customer design, material identity, machine configuration, production record or inspected result.
Keep four identities from collapsing together
- The page title uses a broad big-stone-machine phrase.
- The first image names a chain-saw-machine family.
- The second image names a double-blade family.
- The third image names a wire-cutting-machine family.
Without model-level records, these four labels cannot be treated as synonyms, a product range or a capability chain. The archived arrangement supports only an identity question for future review.
Minimum evidence packet for a narrow application statement
- Machine identity
- Exact model, revision, configuration, tool identity and accountable manufacturer documentation.
- Stone identity
- Traceable material description and evidence that belongs to the same machine and proposed project.
- Project identity
- Named domain, drawings or specification, intended output, responsible parties and recorded acceptance basis.
- Media provenance
- Source and caption records showing what each image depicts and why it supports the exact statement under review.
