The historical page links granite quarry context with countertops, tiles, slabs, and sculptural pieces. Its saved media also carries three different machine names. This ledger separates what was mentioned from what would require exact identity and acceptance evidence.
Ledger of archived output labels
| Source label | Status in this article | Evidence gap |
|---|---|---|
| Granite quarry context | Historical subject only | No named site, granite record, exact machine, wire, or accountable scope |
| Countertops and tiles | Downstream output labels | No drawing, sample identity, inspection basis, or accepted result |
| Slabs | General category | No dimensions, finish criterion, production record, or current product binding |
| Sculptural pieces | Unverified example | No geometry, tolerance, material record, or acceptance evidence |
Why the remaining images stay separate from capability
Fields a review record would have to bind
- Application identity
- Named project, granite identity, dated scope, and responsible issuer.
- System identity
- Exact current machine and related documentation tied to that specific scope.
- Output identity
- Drawing, sample, inspection criteria, and accountable acceptance for the named output.
- Outcome identity
- Declared measurement boundary and dated evidence; no broad result follows from a category or image.
What the ledger can establish
It can establish only that granite extraction and four downstream output categories appeared in the archive and that three differently named machine images were saved with it. Everything beyond that record remains unverified and must not be converted into a capability statement.
