Selecting a stone-mining wire saw begins with the archived power-structure categories, then moves to the stone, mine conditions and project progress. The source does not support choosing from an isolated power or capacity figure.
Start with the power structure named in the archive
The historical page classifies wire-saw machines as hydraulic, electric or internal-combustion structures. These are source categories, not a statement that every current machine is available in each form.
The same page says electric wire saws are generally used for stone mining. Keep that wording as an archived generalization and let the actual mine conditions and verified machine identity control the choice.
Bring stone type and hardness into the selection record
Stone type and hardness are explicit selection inputs in the source. They belong beside the proposed machine rather than being treated as background information after a power structure has already been chosen.
The archive does not provide a material-to-model table. Record the intended stone and its hardness context, then use current model evidence for the final match instead of inferring compatibility from a broad machine class.
Keep mine conditions as a separate decision input
The old article names mine conditions as another factor but does not define a universal checklist or acceptance limit. This prevents the power-source labels alone from becoming a complete selection method.
Describe the conditions for the actual mine and compare them with verified requirements for the candidate machine. Where that evidence is missing, the page supports a question for confirmation, not a performance conclusion.
Use project progress as context, not a capacity promise
Project progress is also named in the archived selection discussion. It can frame the selection request, but the source supplies no verified relationship between a machine class and a promised project result.
State the project context when seeking a model recommendation. Do not convert the historical page's unsupported power-model or capacity statements into a current Huada specification.
The brake-motor statement needs a model link
The archive says a brake motor is generally used for the active motor. It does not identify a model, design record or supplied configuration, so the statement remains a historical machine note rather than a purchasing specification.
Confirm the active-motor arrangement from current first-party documentation for the selected machine. This keeps the page focused on source type and site inputs while leaving model details to evidence that can be traced.
